Morality
Facebook may be trivial at most times, but lately I have been seeing some thought provoking posts. Yes, even social networking can spark civic debate. Today I am thinking about morality. And that maybe our founding fathers, who got most everything right, got one thing wrong.
Even when I was really young, I remember thinking, if our country was founded on the separation of church and state, why does our pledge of allegiance reference God? Why does our money say "In God we trust"? Why do you swear on the holy bible when you are in court? I just sort of shrugged and didn't think much more of it. I was way more of a math and science geek than into politics, or history.
But over the last 15 or so years I've grown more and more interested in politics. I find it really interesting and am forming some political views of my own. If I had to classify myself, I'd call myself a liberal Republican. A year ago I would have said a conservative Democrat. I just haven't been liking what I see of the Democratic party lately. Arrogance. And ignorance. I didn't vote for Obama, which is probably a shocker to most of my friends, but would have loved to have voted for my first choice of democratic candidates.
I tend to lean left, maybe way left, on human rights issues. Abortion, gay marriage, privacy, women's equality, I am more liberal. When we start talking money though I shift way to the right. I support work programs instead of welfare and teaching people to be independant in general. No handouts here. I recognize a difference between a person hitting upon bad times, and a person who feels entitled, and only want my hard earned tax money to help the former get back on their feet.
So rewind to my life in Maine, which now seems so very long ago. OK, it was long ago. About 15 years, I was right out of college. I went to Bar Harbor's tiny town hall to vote. I don't remember what I was voting for, but on my way out a sweet old lady (SOL) asked me to sign her petition.
Me: What's it for?
SOL: To prevent civil unions.
Me: Oh, so like people can't screw over insurance companies and people will have to get married to get coverage?
SOL: No, to prevent gay and lesbian marriages
Me: Oh, why do you want to do that?
SOL: Because the bible says a man and a woman
Me: You can't use that argument. Separation of Church and State. Any other reason?
SOL: The bible.....
Me: Sorry, this is America, I can't sign your petition
SOL: Humpf.
This whole concept of same sex marriage has recently come up again and I've for a long time now felt it was an issue of tolerance. After all, if two people can be happy together, why shouldn't they be able to commit to each other and share all the rights and titles that straight couples enjoy? It's not a lifestyle I would chose for myself but how does it really hurt me if someone else does choose it? On the grand scale, I don't think it does, so I say live and let live.
But those opposed feel like this is a moral shortfall of society. That it somehow will weaken us. It goes against their moral fiber. And as I said earlier, I have always looked at this as a simple issue of intolerance. And as an issue that involves separation of church and state.
So here I am now, thinking about this issue again, and begin to see a flaw in separation of church and state. Is it truely possible? Is it absolutely attainable? Or is it a great concept, but impossible to acheive? I'm not so sure anymore.
That's where morality comes in. Our laws are based on morality. But where does one get their morals? Most often, from their religious beliefs. So how, in a melting pot that is supposed to be accepting of all religions, do you come up with a set of laws that is acceptable to all citizens, and is free from religious influence?
You can't. And that is why this issue, among others, exists today. Everyone is coming at it from an angle that stems from their religious beliefs....their morals. And everyone has a different set of morals.
So as forward-thinking as our founding fathers were, I think they could not see this coming. Yes, I think putting references to God in many of our national symbols and sayings was short-sighted. It means something to me. But not to my neighbor who does not believe in God. What good does it do an aetheist to swear to tell the truth on the bible? Not much. These references are now there, and part of our history, so I do not believe they should be removed. However I do feel that there is hipocracy in the fact they are so ever present, and makes me wonder if a true separation of church and state is actually achievable. The more I think of it, the harder it is for me to say yes.
Kristin